The Tsimane' Rarely Punish: An Experimental Investigation of Dictators, Ultimatums, and Punishment
نویسنده
چکیده
W a revised, standardized set of protocols, the Roots of Human Sociality Project examined whether prior “anomalies” not predicted by any of the available social preference models would reappear in the second round of games played in fifteen small-scale cultures. If they did, we could be more confident that the initial results were robust and not artifacts of an inconsistent methodology. Furthermore, the non-industrialized environmental settings characteristic of the fifteen cultures, with varying degrees of market integration, would allow for a serious treatment of the role of culture, the development, maintenance, and evolution of social norms, and the effects of market access and integration on prosocial behavior (see chapter 2). In this second round of games, with a systematic set of variables measuring different aspects of market access and integration, we were able to examine whether integration, acculturation, and experience with anonymous others in market settings leads to the more uniform and modal patterns of game behavior seen in industrialized societies. Adding the third-party punishment game to the repertoire and applying the strategy method to the ultimatum game gave us greater insight into responder behavior and therefore into second-party and third-party punishment of perceived cooperative norm violations as well. The results of these new games have important implications for our understanding of how reciprocal altruism and other models of cooperation operate in natural populations and how different social preferences lead to variable game behavior in different contexts (see, for example, Bolton and Ockenfels 2000; Charness and Rabin 2002; Falk and Fischbacher 2000; Fehr and Schmidt 1999; Rabin 1993). Finally, the inclusion of follow-up interviews of selected game players provides additional ethnographic insight into how players viewed the games and their expectations of others’ game behavior. Only through ethnographic interviews can we understand the links between emotional responses to specific situations, the internalized norms brought to bear on emotions and behavior, and individuals’ actual behavioral choices. This chapter examines the strategy method ultimatum game (UG), the dictator game (DG), and the third-party punishment game (TPG) as played among the Tsimane' of Bolivia. By allowing Chapter 8
منابع مشابه
Does Willful Ignorance Deflect Punishment? – An Experimental Study
This paper studies whether people can avoid punishment by remaining willfully ignorant about possible negative consequences of their actions for others. We employ a laboratory experiment, using modified dictator games in which a dictator can remain willfully ignorant about the payoff consequences of his decision for a receiver. A third party can punish the dictator after observing the dictator’...
متن کاملThe effect of altruistic tendency on fairness in third-party punishment
Third-party punishment, as an altruistic behavior, was found to relate to inequity aversion in previous research. Previous researchers have found that altruistic tendencies, as an individual difference, can affect resource division. Here, using the event-related potential (ERP) technique and a third-party punishment of dictator game paradigm, we explored third-party punishments in high and low ...
متن کاملAn experimental study of strong reciprocity in bacteria
Strong reciprocity, whereby cooperators punish non-cooperators, may help to explain the evolutionary success of cooperative behaviours. However, theory suggests that selection for strong reciprocity can depend upon tight genetic linkage between cooperation and punishment, to avoid the strategy being outcompeted by non-punishing cooperators. We tested this hypothesis using experimental populatio...
متن کاملHuman punishment is motivated by both a desire for revenge and a desire for equality
a r t i c l e i n f o Humans willingly pay a cost to punish defecting partners in experimental games. However, the psychological motives underpinning punishment are unclear. Punishment could stem from the desire to reciprocally harm a cheat (i.e. revenge) which is arguably indicative of a deterrent function. Alternatively, punishment could be motivated by the desire to redress the balance betwe...
متن کاملPunishment Theory: Moral or Political?
Is the justification of punishment a moral question? Much contemporary writing on punishment, whether by philosophers or legal scholars, treats it as such. Theories of punishment are taken to be moral theories, and the problem of justifying punishment is presented as a key battle-ground in the war between utilitarian and deontological ethics. The question of how and when the state should punish...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005